Despite actively encouraging people to use it, Google has debunked claims that AMP is a ranking factor.<\/p>\n
Case closed, right?<\/p>\n
It\u2019s easy to say AMP doesn\u2019t give a site an advantage in rankings and leave it at that.<\/p>\n
But we can\u2019t write it off and ignore the impact it has on other elements that do matter for SEO.<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s what the evidence says about AMP\u2019s impact on search results and its connection to other ranking factors.<\/p>\n
And if you have more questions about what is and isn\u2019t a Google Ranking Factor, we answer them all in the latest Google Ranking Factors: Fact Or Fiction<\/a> ebook.<\/p>\n The claim here is straightforward \u2013 AMP gives pages a ranking boost in Google\u2019s search results.<\/p>\n Discussions about AMP as a ranking factor began when Google launched the technology in 2018.<\/p>\n Why?<\/strong><\/p>\n People think AMP is a ranking factor because Google has a stake in its success as a technology.<\/p>\n Google is responsible for creating AMP and actively encourages using it as part of a more significant effort to speed up the web.<\/p>\n In theory, Google could increase the adoption rate of AMP by turning it into a ranking signal.<\/p>\n The ranking boost would be a reward for using Google\u2019s new technology. Of course, that would be unfair to any site not using AMP.<\/p>\n If Google used AMP to rank search results, you could argue it would be forcing sites to use its technology to stay relevant.<\/p>\n Thankfully, that\u2019s not how search works.<\/p>\n But AMP isn\u2019t irrelevant to SEO by any stretch.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s look at the evidence on how AMP impacts SEO.<\/p>\n This one is pretty easy \u2013 Google has confirmed<\/a> that AMP is not a ranking factor. Again<\/a>. And again<\/a>.<\/p>\n In Google\u2019s Advanced SEO guide<\/a>, the company says it ranks all<\/strong> pages using the same signals:<\/p>\n \u201cWhile AMP itself isn\u2019t a ranking factor, speed is a ranking factor for Google Search. Google Search applies the same standard to all pages, regardless of the technology used to build the page.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n This quote touches on something we mentioned earlier about AMP impacting other things, like page speed, which are confirmed ranking factors.<\/p>\n Sites that use AMP can potentially benefit from these other signals.<\/p>\n As of July 2018, page speed has been a ranking factor for mobile searches.<\/p>\n Because AMP loads pages instantly, it can help sites send stronger ranking signals regarding mobile page speed.<\/p>\n The increased speed has the potential to lead to better rankings. However, sites can generate the same signals without AMP.<\/p>\n Google\u2019s Core Web Vitals became ranking factors<\/a> with the rollout of the Page Experience update in June 2021.<\/p>\n Leading up to the update\u2019s launch, Google\u2019s communication to site owners<\/a> has always been that AMP can help achieve ideal Core Web Vitals scores.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is a high likelihood that AMP pages will meet the thresholds. AMP is about delivering high-quality, user-first experiences; its initial design goals are closely aligned with what Core Web Vitals measure today.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n This means that sites built using AMP likely can easily meet Web Vitals thresholds.\u201d<\/p>\n Google presented data<\/a> showing that AMP domains were five times more likely to pass Core Web Vitals than non-AMP domains.<\/p>\n Passing Google\u2019s Core Web Vitals thresholds can improve a site\u2019s search rankings.<\/p>\n Again, as with the page speed ranking boost, you can achieve this without AMP.<\/p>\n AMP used to carry various perks that could enhance how a page appears in search results.<\/p>\n For example, Google\u2019s Top Stories carousel appears at the top of search results when looking for news stories and used to only accept AMP pages.<\/p>\n Top Stories eligibility was a ranking advantage unique to AMP for a while.<\/p>\n That changed in June 2021 with the rollout of the Page Experience update, which now makes it possible for non-AMP pages to appear in the Top Stories carousel.<\/p>\n Another unique feature of AMP pages was that a lightning bolt icon appeared in search results to indicate which pages offered faster experiences.<\/p>\n Google has done away with that icon<\/a>. Now, AMP pages are indistinguishable from regular pages in search results.<\/p>\n Since the first version of this ebook was released, AMP has continued to decline steadily.<\/p>\n In response to complaints from publishers and readers alike, an update to Google News<\/a> on mobile bypasses AMP URLs and sends traffic directly to publishers\u2019 websites.<\/p>\n Google has a long history of introducing new tools, hyping them up, and retiring them years later. Examples include failed social media site Google+ and Skype competitor Google Hangouts.<\/p>\n AMP isn\u2019t retired yet, but it would be on-brand for Google to say that this web technology it developed is no longer relevant.<\/p>\n It\u2019s not only Google saying it, but other web companies are dropping AMP from their platforms.<\/p>\n Twitter no longer supports AMP links<\/a> and treats them like Google News by redirecting visitors to the publishers\u2019 domains.<\/p>\n As more companies continue to limit the prevalence of AMP, there\u2019s no reason why you should have to do anything different to your website.<\/p>\n If you\u2019re currently using AMP and are happy with how your webpages perform in search results, then continue doing what you\u2019re doing.<\/p>\n Should the day come when Google shutters the AMP project, it\u2019s not as though your website will stop working. AMP is HTML code crawled and indexed like anything else on the web.<\/p>\n Google has confirmed multiple times that AMP is not a Google ranking factor.<\/p>\n Further, it no longer has unique advantages that could impact click-through rates, such as a distinctive icon and Top Stories exclusivity.<\/p>\n AMP can positively impact other ranking factors (e.g., speed), but it is not a factor on its own.<\/p>\n Find out more about ranking factors: Google Ranking Factors: Fact Or Fiction<\/a>.<\/p>\n Featured image: Paulo Bobita\/Search Engine Journal<\/em><\/p>\nThe Claim: AMP As A Ranking Factor<\/h2>\n
The Evidence Against AMP As A Ranking Factor<\/h2>\n
\n
Core Web Vitals<\/h3>\n
\n
Decline Of AMP<\/h3>\n
AMP Decline Continues<\/h3>\n
Our Verdict: AMP Is Not A Ranking Factor<\/h2>\n
![\"AMP:](\"https:\/\/marketingnewsbox.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/amp-is-it-a-google-ranking-factor-via-sejournal-mattgsouthern.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\n
![\"Ranking](\"https:\/\/marketingnewsbox.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/amp-is-it-a-google-ranking-factor-via-sejournal-mattgsouthern.jpg\")